Re: spamassassin ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 08:02:53AM +0000, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> Perhaps this is drawing a red herring across the trail, but I can't help
> wondering why more people don't use spamprobe in preference to
> spamassassin. IME spamprobe is easier to set up and extremely effective.
> I see only about 2 or 3 false negatives a day at most and no false
> positives at all.
Spamassassin's flexible and proven.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :' :
`. `'` proud Debian admin and user
`- Debian. Because it *must* work. debian.org aboutdebian.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAT1M/UzgNqloQMwcRAhOkAKCjz4r3yDFY9Y9he3dHEb9C/bVaYQCgzoj8
RsHsh4YIVT+A5HTKmy0orkY=
=/BjT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: