[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bogus reply-to



On 2004-08-10, s. keeling penned:
> Incoming from Monique Y. Mudama:
>> 
>> Fine.  I'll get rid of this reply-to, since apparently it's not only
>> causing trouble but also spawning conspiracy theories.  But I won't
>> hold
>
> fwiw, I think you should give it more time to be tested.  I thought it
> was pretty inventive.  I also thought it was amusing that it was going
> to be sending the Cc: to my ISP's admin.  :-)

That could be ... interesting.

> You're not doing anything exceptionally objectionable.  Until somebody
> steps up and gives you reasons why this makes you no better than a
> baby killer, I'd leave it alone.

What's not clear to me is whether, when a reasonable person attempts to
send a message to the list in reply to my message with the bogus
reply-to, it works as intended.

IE, do a significant number of clients interpret "reply-to" as "always
reply to this address even if replying to a message that came from a
list"?

What I want is for people attempting to reply to me *on the list* to
easily be able to do so; on the other hand, I want to make it more
difficult for people attempting to reply to me *directly* to do so.

-- 
monique

Ask smart questions, get good answers:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html



Reply to: