On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 09:12:47PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: > * Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org> [20030407 20:17 PDT]: > > Kinda. Exim4 is a rather large shift from Exim3. Even the config files > > are not compatible. Give how different it is, why would it replace > > exim3, instead of supplement it? I have a perfectly working mail system > > here, and I have no urge at all to have to go and learn a new config > > file syntax for absolutely no gain. > > Apparently, you've never used it =) True. :) > This is not to say that it should replace the exim package right out; I > think creating an exim4 packages is probably the way to go. I just > think saying "learn a new config file syntax for absolutely no gain" is > _way_ too strong a statment. Yeah. Sorry about that, I was kinda talking out my arse :) My point was that my existing system works, and I'd be mighty annoyed if exim4 replaced exim3 and broke my working system. -- Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org> http://www.ertius.org/ GPG keys: 1024D/1E73B7CD, 4096R/3ABDE5EC | Do I look like I want a CC? Words of the day: Vince Foster SWAT Cheney Verisign wire transfer Kh-11 Baranyi
Attachment:
pgpZJl9gVOl47.pgp
Description: PGP signature