[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] CD-R Requirements: Conspiracy



On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 23:37, Pigeon wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 18:55:41 -0800, Vineet Kumar
> <debian-user@virtual.doorstop.net> wrote:
> 
> >This is exactly what burnproof does.  You can load the machine; you can
> >deplete the buffer.  Rather than spewing the contents of the empty
> >buffer to the disc (creating a coaster), it suspends the write and
> >resumes when the buffer fills some more.  

> Just imagine if the electronics of your hard drive spewed garbage to
> the platter if it ran out of incoming data for a bit. Or if your NIC
> broadcast random crap while the processor was attending to someone
> else. What a stupid way to build a device.
> 

*GG* that's bullshit, of course. It is easy not to send data over the
network while you are busy doing something else. It is not so trivial to
resume writing to a CDR exactly at the point you stopped...


> 
> I don't think the CD-R manufacturers are being stupid. I think they're
> being greedy. You have two essentially identical CD-Rs, a cheaper one
> with stupid firmware and one with proper firmware which is more
> expensive. So people buy the cheaper one, and then have to buy the
> more expensive one a bit later because the cheaper one is unfit for
> the purpose for which it was sold (Hit them with Trades Descriptions
> Act?) Or maybe the salesperson in the computer shop will con them into
> buying a whole new computer.
> 
> Moral: never buy anything until it's been out for at least 2 years,
> and make sure you know exactly what you're buying before you go
> anywhere near a shop.
> 
> Burn down Babylon
> Pigeon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: