Re: (OT) The NFS security system
IMHO the best(tm) solution to windows boxes is nearly always Samba, with
the possible exception of shops running AFS anyway. Just follows the
principle that it's better to teach smart computers dumb tricks than to
teach dumb computers smart ones.
ap
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
clists@perrin.socsci.unc.edu * andrew_perrin (at) unc.edu
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Craig Dickson wrote:
> David Roundy wrote:
>
> > I second the recommendation of sfs, which is quite nice and pretty easy to
> > set up. Like nfs, it doesn't require any funky partitioning of your
> > drive.
>
> As opposed to what? Does Coda require weird partitioning?
>
> I took a quick (very quick) look at the Coda and SFS web sites. SFS
> seems very cool, but there appears to be no implementation for
> commercial OS's developed in Redmond, Washington. Which is fine if you
> don't need that, but unfortunately some of us have such machines and
> need to share files with them.
>
> Coda has alpha-quality support for NT 4, Windows 2000, and Windows XP,
> though the Cygwin Unix emulation layer is required for the userland
> tools -- which presumably means you can't (yet) use the Windows Explorer
> to surf Coda shares.
>
> Craig
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: