Re: Sendmail after upgrade to woody
- To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Sendmail after upgrade to woody
- From: Elaine Tsiang <et@ihear.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 10:23:10 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200207221723.g6MHNAa02517@flit.ihear.COM>
- In-reply-to: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAZ1y/Bl/2y063eDrP81Yu38KAAAAQAAAAAGKxEZbcNUegsDS9qaHgDgEAAAAA@weeble.oooarrr.cx>
- References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAZ1y/Bl/2y063eDrP81Yu38KAAAAQAAAAAGKxEZbcNUegsDS9qaHgDgEAAAAA@weeble.oooarrr.cx>
I had same problem with the i386 architecture. I solved it by generating the
key and certificate. I read briefly about how sendmail works with SSL, but
really did not understand what I was doing, other than it stopped the error
message. So any enlightening remarks would be appreciated.
On Monday 22 July 2002 10:11 am, James Ireson wrote:
> After upgrade to woody on my sparc sendmail was refusing to deliver
> anything but internal mail:
>
> Jul 22 18:00:08 weeble sm-msp-queue[15151]: STARTTLS=client, error: load
> verify
> locs /etc/ssl/certs/, /etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-server.crt failed: 0
>
> Was in mail.warn
>
> And commenting out the whole section in sendmail.cf starting with:
>
> # CA directory
> #O CACERTPath=/etc/ssl/certs/
> # CA file
> #O CACERTFile=/etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-server.crt
> # Server Cert
> #O ServerCertFile=/etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-server.crt
> # Server private key
> #O ServerKeyFile=/etc/mail/ssl/sendmail-common.key
> # Client Cert
>
> Seemed to fix it.... I guess these are to do with using SSL certificates
> between the mail servers to encypt mail transfers... But I don't have an
> SSL certificate......
>
> Anyone have any ideas if it was me in the wrong or some messed up
> defaults?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: