also sprach Nicos Gollan <gtdev@spearhead.de> [2002.06.20.0118 +0200]: > > it might be a problem. the 2.4 kernel has the most embarassing > > virtual memory management i've seen. quite possible it's the cause. > > 2.2 still had fair (not good) virtual memory management. > > I hope you aren't talking about that pre-2.4.10 "let's kill init if > we're short on memory" VM? i don't think post-2.4.10 is any better on virtual memory. chuck cranor would faint. but no, i wasn't speaking of that pre-2.4.10 thingy. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a nce jb in th prgrmng indstry
Attachment:
pgphhHe2476Sk.pgp
Description: PGP signature