Re: Eterm equivalent? (was Re: How to *not* restore screen after viewing man pages in X)
>>> Dave Sherohman writes:
Dave> Cool. Works great for xterm, but what's the Eterm equivalent? The
Dave> obvious choice of
Bill> I believe that Eterm, by default, uses Xterm resources. So the
Bill> same setting, "XTerm*titeInhibit:True", should work for Eterms...
Dave> That's the impression I got from what little information I could find
Dave> online, but it produces the same results (and the same errors) when
Dave> passed on the command line. I also just tried creating a .Xdefaults
Dave> with the line
Dave>
Dave> XTerm*titeInhibit: True
Dave>
Dave> then running `xrdb -load ~/.Xdefaults` (and `xrdb -query` to verify
Dave> that it was read) and Eterm showed no sign of noticing.
Dave>
Dave> Any other ideas?
Huh!
I tested it before I posted...
I already have the "XTerm*titeInhibit:True" in my .Xdefaults.
So, after reading Eterm's manpage, to test Eterm I did this:
Eterm -xrm"XTerm*titeInhibit:False"
which, of course failed.
[time passes whilst Bill re-runs his exhaustive tests.... :-]
Huh, again!
I'm wrong. (Of course.)
I don't know how I interpreted that Eterm used xterm's
resources. I was sure that I read that yesterday but it isn't
there today.
This still fails:
Eterm -xrm"XTerm*titeInhibit:False"
but it also fails if I leave the '-xrm"XTerm*titeInhibit:False"'
off altogether.
I can only plead temporary insanity as my defense. However, I
*DID* upgrade my system yesterday afternoon after my previous
"exhaustive" testing so I could always blame it on the upgrade... :-)
Sorry to get your hopes up.
- Bill
+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
Bill Benedetto <bbenedetto@goodyear.com> The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
I don't speak for Goodyear and they don't speak for me. We're both happy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: