[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: remote administration methods



on Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft (madduck@madduck.net) wrote:
> also sprach Karsten M. Self (on Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:27:54PM -0700):
> > Have you looked at bitkeeper (http://www.bitkeeper.com/)?  This is an
> > almost-free software versioning system which addresses several
> > weaknesses of CVS and might suit your needs.  Larry McVoy is also pretty
> > keen on distributed processing issues.
> 
> bitkeeper looks like a good idea, but it's commercial and i do not
> have monetary means available. aside, i could not find some sort of
> evaluation, so i could not establish, whether bitkeeper would solve my
> problems.

BitKeeper has a mixed model.  It's commercial if you use it for
proprietary tasks (and don't want logging).  It's free (beer) if you use
it for free software and/or allow its logging.  Either way, source is
available.

I forget the orignal problem domain and/or whether or not this would be
acceptable to you.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>          http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?             There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/               http://www.kuro5hin.org
   Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA!    http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire                        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html

Attachment: pgpYpsBp4H46z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: