[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: System security question



If you are printing locally I would suggest pdq and xpdq. Read about them on www.linuxprinting.org You can apt-get them from unstable and I think testing. If you just make a sym link called lpd pointing to pdq alot of things work very well. 

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Nathan E Norman <nnorman@micromuse.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 13:08:05 -0600

>On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 02:15:53AM +1100, Martin Bishop wrote:
>> Netstat shows the following services on my home machine:
>> 
>> Active Internet connections (servers and established)
>> *:printer
>
>This is lpd.  You only need this if your mascine has a printer
>atteched to it AND accepts print jobs from other PCs.  Id you don't
>have a printer then don't run lpd.  If you have a printer but only
>print locally, I think you can unbind the tcp port but I'd have to
>look it up.  I really hate lpd; I think it's the worst part of
>unix-like systems.
>
>> *:dict
>
>This is a dictionary server ... not sure why you're running this :)
>
>> *:sunrpc
>
>You only need this if you're running NFS or NIS (or some other RPC
>service).  Chances are you're not, so remove the start links for
>portmap.
>
>> *:auth
>
>This is the ident (RFC1412) protocol ... it's stupid but lots of
>servers want to connect here before they let you use the service.
>I recommend oidentd.
>
>> *:smtp
>
>Unless you _receive_ mail from the network, you don't need to bind to
>the smtp port.  For sending mail you simply need to run through the
>queue periodically.  Exim used to have a default setup where reception
>was controlled by inetd and sending was a cronjob.  I'm sure this is
>still documented somewhere (in other words, you don't run exim as a
>daemon, you fire off a queue runner every 10 minutes ...)
>
>HTH,
>
>-- 
>Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better
>Micromuse Inc.                 | than a perfect plan tomorrow.
>mailto:nnorman@micromuse.com   |   -- Patton
>
>



Reply to: