Re: WPA mit Cisco Karte und Linksys WRT54G
On Day 44 of Bureaucracy 3171, Thomas Letzner wrote:
[...]
> Zum testen habe ich wpa_supplicant nicht daemon gestartet und zwar mit
> diesem Befehl:
> wpa_supplicant -w -i eth1 -c /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -Dipw -d -t
>
> Das Ergebnis ist folgendes:
> root@mobil:/home/thomas # wpa_supplicant -w -i eth1 -c
> /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf -Dipw -d -t
[...]
> Sep 20 23:22:21.304703: wpa_driver_ipw_set_wpa: enabled=1
> ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
> Sep 20 23:22:21.304930: wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=0
> set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
> ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
> Sep 20 23:22:21.305095: Failed to set encryption.
> Sep 20 23:22:21.305165: wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=1
> set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
> ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
> Sep 20 23:22:21.305326: Failed to set encryption.
> Sep 20 23:22:21.305395: wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=2
> set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
> ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
> Sep 20 23:22:21.305555: Failed to set encryption.
> Sep 20 23:22:21.305637: wpa_driver_ipw_set_key: alg=none key_idx=3
> set_tx=0 seq_len=0 key_len=0
> ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
> Sep 20 23:22:21.326082: Failed to set encryption.
> Sep 20 23:22:21.326169: wpa_driver_ipw_set_countermeasures: enabled=0
> ioctl[IPW_IOCTL_WPA_SUPPLICANT]: Operation not supported
> Sep 20 23:22:21.326325: wpa_driver_ipw_set_drop_unencrypted: enabled=1
[...]
Welcher Kernel, welcher Treiber, wie gebaut, welches wpasupplicant?
ttyl8er, t.k.
--
We're Germans and we use Unix. That's a combination of two demographic
groups known to have no sense of humour whatsoever.
Hanno Mueller in dcoup
Reply to: