* Colin Watson (cjwatson@debian.org) [040224 15:06]: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:20:23PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote: > > * Moritz Beller (momo.beller.No-Spam@t-online.de) [040224 14:12]: > > > Yes, but not only! In the former case (upgrading debian distribution) I > > > only want to use secure updates (that means updates which are believed > > > to work very stable and fully tested or at least something like this). I > > > prefer not getting the very latest version instead of a buggy test one. > > > > You describe: > > > > # Security updates for "stable" > > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free > > deb http://security.debian.org testing/updates main contrib non-free > > Drop the second of those. (It has more or less no effect at the moment; > it probably will as we run up to releasing sarge, and perhaps in the > future it may have useful contents more regularly.) Ah, yes, of course. I should have paid more attention to what I was pasting. My point was to inform the OP that for the requirements he describes, a typical stable + security system is the best bet. good times, Vineet -- http://www.doorstop.net/ -- http://www.eff.org/ Defending freedom in the digital world
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature