On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 12:53:47PM +0100, John L Fjellstad wrote: > GCC 2.95 wasn't C++ compliant at all (didn't it get released before > 1998?) Actually, gcc 2.95 does support quite a bit of the standard. It definitely supports namespaces, <iostream> and a majority of the STL. You're probably thinking of the previous version (2.2?). The timeline was gcc 2.2 -> egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> gcc 3 egcs was what drove gcc into C++ standards compliance; I can remember switching from gcc to egcs when doing a project that needed good STL. This was in the fall of '98 if I recall, and gcc at that time was not good enough, but it was not 2.95. Regards, -- Dave Carrigan Seattle, WA, USA dave@rudedog.org | http://www.rudedog.org/ | ICQ:161669680 UNIX-Apache-Perl-Linux-Firewalls-LDAP-C-C++-DNS-PalmOS-PostgreSQL-MySQL
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature