Re: Upload of tex-common

To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Upload of tex-common
From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:48:52 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 871wtl79x7.fsf@florent.maison>
Mail-followup-to: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 86ac89mr15.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> ( Frank Küster's message of "Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:30:14 +0200")
References: <[🔎] 87veqyidi2.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 868xnutcvj.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] 87zmga6txq.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 86ac89mr15.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>

Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:

>> I suppose it's a lintian bug, right?
>
> #374399

Ah, thanks for reporting it.

-- 
Florent

Reply to:

References:
- Upload of tex-common
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Upload of tex-common
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Re: Upload of tex-common
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: Upload of tex-common
  - From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Problem with the "updmap scheme" when a font package is in an "inconsistent state"
Next by Date: Processed: Retitling #273207
Previous by thread: Re: Upload of tex-common
Next by thread: SVN tex-common commit: r1439 - in tex-common/trunk: debian scripts
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread