Frank Küster wrote:
Magnus Ekdahl <magnus@debian.org> wrote:Ralf, what do think about upstreams suggestion on texmacs-dev to use his Type 1 fonts instead? That solves this (and future similar) problem(s).This is about the part still assigned to texmacs, and I need not care about it, correct?
Yes :)
- many warning messages such as: TeXmacs] Trying to create ecrm10.123pk from 300 dpi mktexpk: Mismatched mode ljfour and resolution 300; ignoring mode. mktexpk: Running mf-nowin -progname=mf \mode:=cx; mag:=123/300; nonstopmode; input ecrm10 They seem harmless, but texmacs should avoid them if possible.This is due to mktexpk first guessing the wrong mode ljfour. ljfour is not specified by texmacs though. There is a variable TEX_HUSH that can be used to control the amount of warning messages generated by mktexpk. But even at the quietest setting your warning does not go away. I am reassigning this part of your bug to the package with mktexpk (tetex-bin).Hm, so the solution would be to make mktexpk guess the right mode.
Likely, judging from the mktexpk manual (kpathsea) it is not easy to predict the effect of choosing different modes though. What
would be right?
Good question, the output the mode that is actually used is cx. I cannot see that cx mode leads to a problem, but this is really an upstream question. I have mailed a question to texmacs-dev, hopefully they will answer this question.
/Magnus Ekdahl