Re: new cm-super and cm-super-x11
On 01.10.05 Norbert Preining (preining@logic.at) wrote:
> On Fre, 30 Sep 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > Things I don't like:
> > 1. Both programs didn't ever got a copyright statement
>
> True. I would ask the author, or assume they are GPL since they are
> in the .orig.tar.gz from cm-super in GPL. And Mickael once
> mentioned that he got the ok to distribute the files under GPL.
> (But maybe it was from the .pl file he was talking)
>
Included the mail from Peter stating it is Freeware. I don't say it
is GPL.
> > 2. You said you have anywhere a man page for one of the programs?
> > Expanding it describe the other too and setting a symlink should
> > not be that hard.
>
> I attach the quick hack manpage I wrote.
>
I've expanded it and included a description of the reverse program.
> > 3. I didn't lintian the final package.
>
> W: pfb2t1c2pfb source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.1
>
> should be 3.6.1.2 (or was it 2.1)
>
changed to 3.6.2.
> W: pfb2t1c2pfb: copyright-lists-upstream-authors-with-dh_make-boilerplate
>
fixed.
> W: pfb2t1c2pfb: unknown-section unknown
>
fixed to tex.
Would be glad if you'd lintian it again. The thing I don't like is
how I installed the second man page. During build I create a sym
link, which is converted into a file during package build.
Needs to be fixed. Can I use dh_installman to do that?
> On Sam, 01 Okt 2005, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > 5. The binary Debian package was built on Ubuntu hoary. Needs rebuild
> > on Debian unstable.
>
> I build the package in a sid pbuilder and made it available apt like at
>
Need the same again, but we should fix the thing above before.
Packages again at http://www.amasol.de/~preusse/pfb2t1c2pfb/.
H.
--
Any fool can paint a picture, but it takes a wise person to be able to sell it.
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/
Reply to: