Bug#189341: tetex-bin: texdoctk not packaged correctly
Bug # 189341 should *not* be wishlist. texdoctk is *broken* if
tetex-extra is not installed, and there's nothing to indicate that this
is the problem. Isn't that a policy violation?
It totally defeats the purpose of splitting off tetex-extra if you have
to install it (39 MB!) anyway, just to get the conf file for texdoctk.
Why can't the files /etc/texdoctk/texdocrc and
/etc/texdoctk/texdoctk.dat be put in tetex-base?
Reply to: