[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#188735: marked as done (tetex-bin: I get a Segmentation fault wenn I try to run initex, latex or pdflatex)



Your message dated Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:03:33 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <20030416.080333.74729041.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
and subject line reinstallation fixed the problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Apr 2003 18:25:00 +0000
>From a_d@gmx.at Sat Apr 12 13:25:00 2003
Return-path: <a_d@gmx.at>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 194PgR-0002Jk-00; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:24:59 -0500
Received: (qmail 24352 invoked by uid 65534); 12 Apr 2003 18:24:27 -0000
Received: from chello080110251211.119.11.vie.surfer.at (EHLO LastEsel) (80.110.251.211)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp023-rz3) with SMTP; 12 Apr 2003 20:24:27 +0200
Received: from ad by LastEsel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 194Pfr-0004D9-00; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 20:24:23 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: tetex-bin: I get a Segmentation fault wenn I try to run initex, latex
	or pdflatex
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 20:24:23 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E194Pfr-0004D9-00@LastEsel>
Sender: Albert Dengg <a_d@gmx.at>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
	tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux LastEsel 2.4.20-grsec #1 Tue Mar 11 21:07:11 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages tetex-bin depends on:
ii  debconf                    1.2.34        Debian configuration management sy
ii  debianutils                2.4.1         Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii  dpkg                       1.10.9        Package maintenance system for Deb
ii  ed                         0.2-20        The classic unix line editor
ii  libc6                      2.3.1-16      GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcc1                    1:3.2.3-0pre8 GCC support library
ii  libkpathsea3               2.0.2-3       shared libkpathsea for teTeX
ii  libpng12-0                 1.2.5-11      PNG library - runtime
ii  libstdc++5                 1:3.2.3-0pre8 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libwww-ssl0 [libwww0]      5.4.0-6       The W3C-WWW library (SSL support)
ii  libxaw7                    4.2.1-6       X Athena widget set library
ii  perl                       5.8.0-17      Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  t1lib1                     1.3.1-1       Type 1 font rasterizer library - r
ii  tetex-base                 2.0.2-3       basic teTeX library files
ii  xlibs                      4.2.1-6       X Window System client libraries
ii  zlib1g                     1:1.1.4-11    compression library - runtime

-- debconf information:
* tetex-bin/hyphen: latin
  tetex-bin/oldcfg: true
* tetex-bin/cnf_name: 
* tetex-bin/use_debconf: true
* tetex-bin/groupname: users
  tetex-bin/userperm: false
  tetex-bin/groupperm: true
* tetex-bin/lsr-perms: true


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 188735-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2003 23:03:40 +0000
>From kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp Tue Apr 15 18:03:40 2003
Return-path: <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
Received: from civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp [150.59.48.140] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 195ZSl-00062F-00; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:03:40 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=kohda)
	by civic.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 195ZSi-0006C5-00
	for <188735-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:03:36 +0900
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:03:33 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20030416.080333.74729041.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
To: 188735-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: reinstallation fixed the problem
From: Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: 188735-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=4.0
	tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
	version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 

I got an personal email from the submitter and he said
the reinstallation fixed the problem so I close this.

Thanks,
			 2003.4.16(Wed)
-- 
 Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian
 Atsuhito Kohda <kohda@debian.org>
 Department of Math., Univ. of Tokushima



Reply to: