Am 2005-02-12 05:35:06, schrieb Joao Clemente: > Hum? What is 64MB? 102 packages is almost the same as the number I > reported, but 64 MB is way off the 152 MB my woody occupies (and I > installed in a ext3 partition also, dunno the block size) My Servers have: hda1 250 MB / Rescue system hda2 250 MB swap hda3 500 MB /tmp hda5 500 MB /prod1 First productions system hda6 250 MB /prod1/var/log hda7 500 MB /prod2 Second productions system hda8 250 MB /prod2/var/log ... Now if I update to Sarge it does not moer fit on the Partitons I have to reinstall 26 Servers... > >With the base of Sarge I do nt know the Packages, > >but there are 190 MByte. > > Once again, what is 190 MByte? Baseinstall of SARGE without any additional Packages selected. > And once again, I cannot understand your reasoning here.... I just said > above that sarge takes 372 MB TOTAL, you say a 500 MByte partition is > too small for your upgrade for sarge? I must be missing something here... Install apache, php, courier-*, ssh and some other required Server packages... and you know what I mean. Some of the Packages are in SARGE tree to four times bigger as in WOODY, - and I do not need it !!! This ist, why I try to continue with WOODY. You know: Don't touch a running System! > Joao Clemente Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Attachment:
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature