RE : 2.5.40 on Sunblade 100 (was Re: NCPFS, anyone?)
Hi,
> However, I think Dave is making it a point to get gcc-3.2 able to
build
> kernels.
I compiled a 2.4.19 kernel with gcc-3.2.1 on my Blade 100 and it seems
to work fine for the moment.
Olivier Hochreutiner
olivier.hochreutiner@epfl.ch
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ben Collins [mailto:bcollins@debian.org]
Envoyé : jeudi, 3. octobre 2002 03:01
À : Roy Bixler
Cc : David S. Miller; debian-sparc@lists.debian.org;
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Objet : Re: 2.5.40 on Sunblade 100 (was Re: NCPFS, anyone?)
> I thought GCC 3.1 and above are OK for compiling kernels on
> Ultrasparc. I also thought the IDE drivers were from the 2.4 series
> and should be stable. Will I have to eat my words there too?
egcs64 has always been the suggested way to compile kernels from
ultrasparc. Nothing else has ever been suggested or supported up to this
point.
However, I think Dave is making it a point to get gcc-3.2 able to build
kernels.
As for 2.5.40 on Blade100, I just got a kernel built on mine, and I'm
about to reboot myself.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: