Re: ITP: xslj, a XSL processor (XSL is one of the stylesheet format of XML)
- To: eichin@thok.org (Mark W. Eichin)
- Cc: debian-sgml@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: ITP: xslj, a XSL processor (XSL is one of the stylesheet format of XML)
- From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
- Date: 01 Jul 1999 11:02:54 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] oawvwk8lb5.fsf@burrito.fake>
- In-reply-to: eichin@thok.org's message of "29 Jun 1999 09:49:09 -0400"
- References: <199906282027.WAA08844@ludwigV.sources.org> <E10yhKi-0000Z5-00@burrito> <xe1u2rr15ii.fsf@paycheck.thok.org>
eichin@thok.org (Mark W. Eichin) writes:
> Sad but true. (I actually like scheme, and have written jade
> "transformation" style sheets for personal dtd's very effectively, yet
> that isn't even real DSSSL, that's a jade extension...)
It might be "proprietary" to jade, but it is very powerful. In fact,
the jade transformation system a major element inspiring the design of
the XSLT.
> On the other
> hand, my "slideshow" DTD can't really be formatted into slides with
> jade, AFAIK; though jade is great to transform it to html for the web
> site, the slides are raw PostScript generated by a perl script using
> XML::Parser (older versions used SGMLS.) See
> http://www.mit.edu/iap/xml/index.html
Well, you are saying that for some reason you can't get the print
stylesheet to work right, correct? What was the problem/limitation
you hit? Was it because of simple-page-sequence? A backend problem?
> for the examples. So maybe the "single stylesheet" model is weak;
> even for docbook, the print and html DSSSL are separate (related, but
> distinct.)
This isn't true. You can use the "print" stylesheets to produce
HTML/CSS, using the '-t html' backend. It is experimental, and I've
never tried it, but I've heard pretty decent things about it.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: