[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: SSH



Scott-

It seems to me you have the OPENSSH implementation of SSH. The SSH that is
being talked about in this thread is the "commercial" version of SSH.
Distinct difference :)

Henrik
---
Henrik Hudson

Microsoft: "Where would you like to go to today"
Linux: "Where would you like to go tomorrow"
FreeBSD: "Hey, when are you guys going to catch up"


    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Scott Bigham [mailto:dsb@killerbunnies.org]
    > Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 10:09
    > To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
    > Subject: Re: SSH
    > 
    > 
    > On Feb 9, 2001, Christian Hammers wrote:
    > 
    > > The ssh package at non-us.debian.org is 
    > ssh_2.3.0p1-1.11_i386.deb
    > 
    > What worries me is, the version of ssh on my machine is listed as:
    > 
    > ii  ssh            2.1.1p4-2      Secure rlogin/rsh/rcp 
    > replacement (OpenSSH)
    > 
    > which doesn't correspond to either the 2.3.0p1-1.11 
    > package in unstable
    > or the 1.2.3-9.1 package in stable and testing -- or, for 
    > that matter,
    > to the 1.2.3-9 version that (IIRC) was listed as the 
    > vulnerable version
    > in the alert.  And even with security.debian.org in my 
    > sources.list,
    > 'apt-get update; apt-get install ssh' insists that I have 
    > the latest
    > version.  Am I vulnerable?  If so, what do I need to 
    > upgrade to, and
    > how?
    > 
    > 						-sbigham
    > 
    > 
    > --  
    > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-request@lists.debian.org
    > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
    > listmaster@lists.debian.org
    > 



Reply to: