Re: Packaging Depends For Tests/Examples
On 26/02/10 at 10:43 +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > Just wondering if there is some established convention on this.
> That is a good question, I actually don't really know.
> I've seen that Lucas added the suggestion to add tests to the build
> target if there are any on the Ruby 1.9.1. transition wiki page.
> So maybe I've missed something.
No, it was just a suggestion. I ran into some packages where the 1.9.0
support was added without testing it, so I thought that it was a good
idea to push for more tests.
| Lucas Nussbaum
| email@example.com http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: firstname.lastname@example.org GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |