Re: RubyGems package
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 00:49 +0900, Daigo Moriwaki wrote:
> >* Depending on ruby on debian/control indicates:
> The new build-dependences should contain enough packages.
But it has redundant dependencies:
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), docbook-to-man, ruby (>= 1.8), ruby
(<< 1.9), ruby1.8, libruby1.8, libyaml-ruby1.8, libzlib-ruby1.8
Shouldn't by enough to depend on ruby? Or even ruby1.8, in case it needs
specific 1.8 depend?
The same for libgems-ruby1.8.
I mean, why specify a ruby dependency with a version indicating clearly
> >* Since libgems-ruby will provide atm libgems-ruby1.8, this last one
> >should be an indep-arch package (both are architecture dependant).
> What does mean 'atm' ?
At The Moment.
> Anyway, I rewrote with "Architecture: all". I misunderstood 'any' with
> Thanks. I am in the process of New Maintainer.
But now both of the packages are 'all' packages. libgems-ruby should be
an independent architecture package providing dependent architecture
> >* Upstream latest release is not 0.8.3, why not package 0.8.4?
> I put the new one at the same site.
Ruby is fun :)
David Moreno Garza <email@example.com> | http://www.damog.net/
I wanna live 'til I die, no more, no less.
GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C671 257D