[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#976811: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#976811: transition: php8.1



Hi Bryce,

On 19-01-2022 10:28, Bryce Harrington wrote:

With [4] applied, I'm seeing the following dumped on armhf:

## https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/m/mediawiki/jammy/armhf
cat: /var/log/mediawiki/error.log: No such file or directory
2022-01-19 09:16:57 autopkgtest-lxd-eeoxik autopkgtestwiki: [e33d1ec89af515673078437e] /mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page   PHP Fatal Error from line 110 of /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/json/FormatJson.php: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded
#0 [internal function]: MWExceptionHandler::handleFatalError()
#1 {main}
2022-01-19 09:17:27 autopkgtest-lxd-eeoxik autopkgtestwiki: [1284cbae5a84eb5387f33003] /mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page   PHP Fatal Error from line 152 of /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded
#0 [internal function]: MWExceptionHandler::handleFatalError()
#1 {main}
2022-01-19 09:17:57 autopkgtest-lxd-eeoxik autopkgtestwiki: [31731278ed6070e946af4fbe] /mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page   PHP Fatal Error from line 110 of /usr/share/mediawiki/includes/json/FormatJson.php: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded
#0 [internal function]: MWExceptionHandler::handleFatalError()
#1 {main}
cat: /var/log/mediawiki/fatal.log: No such file or directory

As this issue seems intermittent (as mediawiki passed at one point) I guess you're trying to say that you think mediawiki got slower with php8.1? Or is this timeout new with php8.1? Obviously the code that fails to finish is mediawiki's code, so it doesn't seem to be a generic issue with php8.1 except if the timeout happens because of something inside php8.1. Can anybody shed a light on if it's reasonable to time out on what mediawiki is trying to do here. And why doesn't it happen on other architectures (in Debian, as far as I checked)?

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: