Re: BinNMU for ftgl-dev?
Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> Ok. So this is only an issue because ftgl was last built on these
> architectures in 2004, using g++-3.3; i.e., it only affects
> static-*only* libraries that haven't yet been rebuilt for the c2 ABI
> transition, since any package building a shared lib should already have
> been rebuilt on all archs.
That's my understanding, although wouldn't ftgl have been rebuilt when it
was uploaded in July of 2005? I don't *think* it should be as old as
2004.
> Are these really the only architectures where the old ftgl packages are
> broken and need a rebuild?
Well, gnubg at least builds on every other architecture and works on x86
(I haven't tested on others), but it uses only a small part of the
library.
> BTW, the binNMU on m68k has failed with a compiler segfault:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=ftgl&ver=2.1.2-2%2Bb1&arch=m68k&stamp=1141455264&file=log&as=raw
Whee.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: