Re: Which release-critical bugreports are really release-critical?
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 10:36:06AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steve Langasek (vorlon@netexpress.net) [031222 04:40]:
> > On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 10:14:19PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > I've asked myself this question for more than one time. So I played a
> > > bit with perl today, and generated a statistics of the RC-bug reports
> > > that match the following conditions:
> > > - Package is actually in Sarge
> > > - Bug is (tagged Sid | has no release tag at all)
> > > - Bug is neither fixed nor sarge-ignore
> >
> > > With these conditions, I count about 368 bugs right now.
>
> > Does this account for packages which are in sarge, but are specific to
> > a particular architecture?
>
> You mean the "Package is actually in Sarge"? I checked it that way
> that the bugs are not preceded by [X] on the official RC-bug count.
The implementation of that [X] thing is ... a little stupid. There may
well be more bugs that only exist in the version in sid.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: