On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:37:06AM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry that I'm back here whining again, but I don't think we can
> afford to keep this new serious kdm.postinst bug [1] in the packages
> for a few months as before.
>
> Chris, what are your plans on this ? When do you plan to do a new
> upload for this ? I can understand if you wait for some more patches
> to be applied first in order to not make too much uploads of the large
> kdebase package, but I don't think we can afford to wait more than say
> a week or so.
There appears to be another RC bug now that needs to be fixed as well,
which I unfortunately don't know how to fix. It causes kdebase to fail
to build on both mips/mipsel.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdebase&ver=4%3A3.1.4-1&arch=mips&stamp=1071907102&file=log&as=raw
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=kdebase&ver=4%3A3.1.4-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1071915371&file=log&as=raw
The problem file is kdebase/kcontrol/info/memory_linux.cpp
In file included from ../../../kcontrol/info/memory.cpp:433,
from kcm_info_la.all_cpp.cpp:3:
../../../kcontrol/info/memory_linux.cpp: In member function `void
KMemoryWidget::update()':
../../../kcontrol/info/memory_linux.cpp:14: error: `SYS_sysinfo' undeclared
(first use this function)
../../../kcontrol/info/memory_linux.cpp:14: error: (Each undeclared identifier
is reported only once for each function it appears in.)
make[4]: *** [kcm_info_la.all_cpp.lo] Error 1
/usr/include/bits/syscall.h defines SYS_sysinfo on most archs though so
is this a bug in glibc for mips/mipsel? Or should the code be using
sys/sysinfo.h instead of bits/syscall.h? Andrew Suffield mentioned it
probably should be using "sysinfo(&info)" instead of using syscall. Does
that sound correct to you?
IMHO we should fix this problem in the next upload as well.
Thanks,
Chris
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature