Re: [UDD] Suggested table: release_order
On 03/02/10 at 16:47 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> As an alternative suggestion that just occurred to me, we can actually
> define a new datatype for releases (as we did for package versions)
> which is an enumeration sorted as we please. That way "<" ordering would
> work automagically. I'm not sure it will be worth, though.
We had that in the past. The problem is that adding a release to the
release type requires recreating all the tables that use that type,
which is super-annoying, of course.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: