Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> writes: > On 22/10/08 at 22:51 +0000, Clint Adams wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:10:29AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> > This was initially written by me, then discussed within DAM (so take >> > us two for we) and then discussed with DSA, FTPMaster, >> > Keyring-Maint, Secretary, FrontDesk and the DPL. >> I am disappointed in all of these people. > He wrote "discussed", this doesn't mean that all of them agreed fully on > this proposal^Hdecision. It would be interesting to have the point of > view of each of those groups. You all know I'm lazy, so I'll just repeat myself: | > (A small T&S basically, the most important T&S questions for them.) | This seems excessive. The point of DM was to kill off all the | bureaucracy and allow people in when they were able to convince a DD of | their skills. Adding a (small) NM process makes DM completely useless, I | think. [...] | Anyway, I've thought about this some more. At the moment, your proposal | seems to have three goals: | (i) Allow non-developer contributors to become project members. | (ii) Get rid of the horrible hack that DM is and replace it with | something closer to NM. [... stuff that was removed from the proposal and is now irrelevant ...] | (i) IMO needs a change to the constitution, as said before. This should | be a no-brainer, someone needs to prepare the changes, send it to -vote, | then kick the secretary to do the CfV. This should go through without | much discussion (draft title: "Constitutional Amendment: Allow | non-developer members"). | | (ii) is the messy part. Formally, doing it by declamation from | DAM/ftp-team is iffy, as it gets rid of a process that was endorsed by | the developer body in a GR last year. | The other problem with your proposal is that you make it harder to | contribute as package maintainer. Heck, making that easier was the whole | point of DM, reverting that change and replacing DM by Debian's NM | process five years ago (and that's basically what you are suggesting - | T&S has grown excessively, a small subset of today's questions is what | people needed to do 5 years ago). | The fact that the NM committee (and not some random DD) does the package | check before allowing DM uploads should be enough. That's actually | what I had in mind when I proposed something like DM 2 years ago - which | was fine with you back then. Marc -- Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt 38: Windows 95 Das Fortran 77 der Benutzungsoberflächen
Attachment:
pgpgWgq1v00BW.pgp
Description: PGP signature