debian-policy Nov 1999 by thread
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Icon and pixmap location
Julian Gilbey
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Mark W. Eichin
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Julian Gilbey
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Wichert Akkerman
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Joey Hess
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Roland Rosenfeld
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Julian Gilbey
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Clint Adams
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Branden Robinson
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Peter Makholm
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Julian Gilbey
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Josip Rodin
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Daniel James Patterson
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Julian Gilbey
objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Aaron Van Couwenberghe
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Julian Gilbey
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Joseph Carter
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Branden Robinson
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Julian Gilbey
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Branden Robinson
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Joey Hess
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Branden Robinson
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Chris Waters
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Joey Hess
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Branden Robinson
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
ferret
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Branden Robinson
Re: objection! [was Re: Icon and pixmap location]
Julian Gilbey
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Jaime E. Villate
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Debian Packages Information
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Debian Packages Information
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Debian Packages Information
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Debian Packages Information
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Debian Packages Information
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Debian Packages Information
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Debian Packages Information
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Debian Packages Information
Re: Icon and pixmap location
Paul Slootman
Bug#46522: another second
Torsten Landschoff
FWD: dh_compress
Joey Hess
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Laurent Martelli
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Seth R Arnold
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Chip Salzenberg
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Joseph Carter
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Joey Hess
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Laurent Martelli
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Joseph Carter
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Massimo Dal Zotto
compressing copyright
Seth R Arnold
Re: compressing copyright
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Joey Hess
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Drake Diedrich
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Joseph Carter
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Manoj Srivastava
Re: FWD: dh_compress
Joey Hess
ot: debhelper (Re: FWD: dh_compress)
Edward Betts
Re: ot: debhelper (Re: FWD: dh_compress)
Joey Hess
"Spamming" apology
Julian Gilbey
Re: Thoughts about src-dep implementation
Roman Hodek
Re: Thoughts about src-dep implementation
Chris Waters
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Thoughts about src-dep implementation
Manoj Srivastava
Re: Thoughts about src-dep implementation
Chris Waters
ITP: build-essential
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: ITP: build-essential
Julian Gilbey
[RFC] Debian Spelling Dictionaries and Tools Policy
Rafael Laboissiere
Processed: twiddling with status of my bug report
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: this has gone on too long
Debian Bug Tracking System
Policy 3.1.0.0 uploaded
Julian Gilbey
Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.1.0.0
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#17621: marked as done ([PROPOSED]: About versions based on dates)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#19179: marked as done ([PROPOSED]: Shared Libraries clarification (ls -f))
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#24695: marked as done ([REJECTED] man-browser should be in virtual packages list)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#32449: marked as done (Section 3.3.4 (/etc/rc.boot) of policy needs updating)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#32448: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 17/08/99] Policy still suggests /etc/rc.boot instead of /etc/rcS.d)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#33076: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 1999/02/08] Clarification of "extra priority")
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#40766: marked as done ([PROPOSED] Rewrite of "Configuration files" section)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#40767: marked as done ([PROPOSED] wording cleanup w.r.t. conffile/configuration file)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#41095: marked as done (small suggestion for packaging-manual)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#41121: marked as done ([PROPOSED] Add VISUAL when checking for user's editor)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#41547: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 10/08/99] Correct section 3.3 to take account of file-rc)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#41829: marked as done (debian-policy: Documents stored in /usr/doc/debian-policy, should be /usr/share/doc/debian-policy)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#42358: marked as done (policy says /var/lib/games, FHS says /var/games)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#42849: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 17/08/99] FHS-compliant location of compiled examples)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#44620: marked as done (packaging-manual: nitpick on section 4.2.14.)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#44643: marked as done (packaging-manual: packaging-manual won't install)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#43651: marked as done ([AMENDMENT 13/10/1999] mailbox locking)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#44922: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 10/26/99] clarify policy on stuff in /var/local)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#45307: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] virtual package ident-server)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#45318: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 07/10/1999] Amend contrib definition)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#45561: marked as done ([PROPOSAL] tech-ctte: /usr/share/doc)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#46516: marked as done ([ACCEPTED 25/10/1999] MIME support sub-policy)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#48570: marked as done (debian-policy: policy is /usr/share/doc, but debian-policy is in /usr/doc!)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#8221: marked as done ([REJECTED] Add ispell-dictionary to virtual package list)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#41232: marked as done ([ACCEPTED] Build-time dependencies on binary packages)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#49423: packaging-manual: packaging-manual should depend on debian-policy.
Liran Zvibel
Bug#49423: marked as done (packaging-manual: packaging-manual should depend on debian-policy.)
Debian Bug Tracking System
new menu section for file/disk related programs
Josip Rodin
Re: new menu section for file/disk related programs
Chris Waters
Re: new menu section for file/disk related programs
Joseph Carter
Where to put kernels for rbootd?
Martin Schulze
Re: Where to put kernels for rbootd?
Julian Gilbey
Policy on X requirements.
Dan Merillat
Re: Policy on X requirements.
David Rocher
Making a NEW area (Re: Intention to Donate troll-ftpd 1.25)
Trek Star
Re: Making a NEW area (Re: Intention to Donate troll-ftpd 1.25)
Jim Lynch
Re: Making a NEW area (Re: Intention to Donate troll-ftpd 1.25)
Trek Star
Re: Making a NEW area (Re: Intention to Donate troll-ftpd 1.25)
Jim Lynch
Re: Making a NEW area (Re: Intention to Donate troll-ftpd 1.25)
Hamish Moffatt
Correction to the build-dependency spec, Packaging manual section 8.1
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: /etc/ppp/ip-{up|down}.d/
Paul Slootman
Uploaded build-essential 1 (source i386) to master
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#49901: Correction to the build-dependency spec, Packaging manual section 8.1
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#49901: marked as done (Correction to the build-dependency spec, Packaging manual section 8.1)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#49901: Marking bug forwardeed
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Processed: Marking bug forwardeed
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: I think this belongs against packaging-manual now
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Nicolás Lichtmaier
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Philip Hands
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Chris Lawrence
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Philip Hands
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Mark Baker
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Nicolás Lichtmaier
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Richard Braakman
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Marco d'Itri
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Philip Hands
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Joel Klecker
Bug#48045: debian-policy: non-US is a misnomer
Philip Hands
RE: Redundant code for non-us?
arto . astala
Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.1.1.0
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#50502: Packaging manual typo /var/lib/dpkg/*.shlibs
Kevin Ryde
Bug#50502: Packaging manual typo /var/lib/dpkg/*.shlibs
Julian Gilbey
Bug#50502: marked as done (Packaging manual typo /var/lib/dpkg/*.shlibs)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#50565: packaging-manual: update dpkg-shlibdeps example in 3.1.4
Julian Gilbey
Redefinition of `extra'
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: Redefinition of `extra'
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
imp blows away hand-edited changes in /etc/imp/defaults.php3
Craig Sanders
Re: imp blows away hand-edited changes in /etc/imp/defaults.php3
Joey Hess
Re: imp blows away hand-edited changes in /etc/imp/defaults.php3
Craig Sanders
Bug#50832: [PROPOSED] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Bug#50832: PROPOSED] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Raul Miller
Bug#50832: PROPOSED] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Joel Klecker
Bug#50832: PROPOSED] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#50832: PROPOSED] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#50832: PROPOSED] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Jason Gunthorpe
Bug#50832: PROPOSED] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Chris Waters
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
Processed: Bug#50832: [AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Santiago Vila
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Raul Miller
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Jason Gunthorpe
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Julian Gilbey
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Raul Miller
Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Julian Gilbey
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#50832: AMENDMENT] Clarify meaning of Essential: yes
Anthony Towns
version-number-comparison algorithm dox confusion in Debian Packaging Manual 3.1.1.0
Matt Swift
Re: version-number-comparison algorithm dox confusion in Debian Packaging Manual 3.1.1.0
Anthony Towns
Re: version-number-comparison algorithm dox confusion in Debian Packaging Manual 3.1.1.0
Matt Swift
Re: imp blows away hand-edited changes...
Ivan E. Moore II
Re: imp blows away hand-edited changes...
Craig Sanders
Re: imp blows away hand-edited changes...
Ivan E. Moore II
Re: imp blows away hand-edited changes...
Craig Sanders
Re: imp blows away hand-edited changes...
Ivan E. Moore II
Re: imp blows away hand-edited changes...
Craig Sanders
Re: Bug#50617: imp blows away hand-edited changes...
Ivan E. Moore II
Bug#50857: Packaging-manual has typos.
HAYASE Shigenori
Bug#50857: marked as done (Packaging-manual has typos.)
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#51091: Packaging-manual: there is not a </chapt>
HAYASE Shigenori
Bug#51091: Packaging-manual: there is not a </chapt>
Julian Gilbey
Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Goswin Brederlow
Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Seth R Arnold
Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Ben Collins
Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Chris Waters
Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Joey Hess
Re: Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Chris Waters
Re: Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Joey Hess
Bug#51116: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Roland Rosenfeld
policy summary
Joey Hess
Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Goswin Brederlow
Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Brian Mays
Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Anthony Towns
Re: Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Daniel Barclay
Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Raul Miller
Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Goswin Brederlow
Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Brian Mays
Bug#51262: Info received (was Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage )
Debian Bug Tracking System
Bug#51262: Suggestion: Packages should carry a manpage
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Bug#43529: debian-policy: mail locking in Debian is _not_ NFS safe
Roland Rosenfeld
Processed: Re: debian-policy: mail locking in Debian is _not_ NFS safe
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed:
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.1.1.1
Debian Bug Tracking System
[PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joseph Carter
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joey Hess
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joey Hess
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joey Hess
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Chris Waters
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joel Klecker
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joey Hess
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Tomasz Wegrzanowski
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joey Hess
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Wichert Akkerman
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Peter S Galbraith
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Chris Waters
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Roland Rosenfeld
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Raul Miller
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Chris Waters
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Seth R Arnold
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Manoj Srivastava
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Anthony Towns
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Chris Waters
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Jason Gunthorpe
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Joey Hess
Re: [PROPOSED] Change package relations policy to remove references to non-free from main
Julian Gilbey
Bug#51472: packaging manual shouldn't dictate dselect behaviour
Wichert Akkerman
Bug#51412: conflict in documents
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
Bug#51412: conflict in documents
Bdale Garbee
LSB specification mailing list
Daniel Quinlan
Re: LSB specification mailing list
Wichert Akkerman
The last update was on 18:05 GMT Mon Jun 17. There are 254 messages. Page 1 of 1.
[
previous month
]
[
first page
]
[previous page]
Page 1 of 1
[next page]
[
last page
]
[
next month
]
[
Date Index
] [
Subject Index
] [
Author Index
] [
Other Debian Lists
] [
Debian Home
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc