Re: Source dependencies: are we ready?

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Santiago Vila wrote:

> On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Joel Klecker wrote:
> 
> > At 14:42 +0200 1999-10-27, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > > I doubt gcc works without ldso ;-)
> > 
> > Sure it does, it's not a libc5 executable.
> 
> Ooops! I forgot that libc6 uses its own dynamic linker.
> Why is ldso still essential, then?

Mmm, surely because it provides ldconfig...
[ This is not my day ].

-- 
 "b79d9a87c4c26149c3b25f444ff5055b" (a truly random sig)