Re: hash sum mismatch fpr ftp.se.d.o and ftp.nl.d.o
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2014-04-14 22:39, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:23:19PM +0200, Martin Bagge / brother
> wrote:
>>> Since about ten hours back we've observed hash sum mismatch
>>> messages for both ftp.se.d.o and ftp.nl.d.o. Something fishy is
>>> going on somewhere.
>>>
>>> When writing this dinstall has been running for 30 minutes on
>>> ftp-master (timestamp 1397505123).
> I'm not sure about what you mean: have you been observing hash sum
> mismatch since 10 hours, or it was 10 hours ago ?
>
> Because there is no sync in progress yet on ftp.nl nor ftp.se at
> the very moment.
Repeated errors from different machines, first occurrence about 1400
CEST yesterday,
Tried ftp.fi.d.o this morning from a third machine with the same outcome.
W: Failed to fetch
xz:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.fi.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_source_Sources:
Hash Sum mismatch
However ftp.se.d.o and ftp.nl.d.o is back on track. Removing deb-src
from sources.list makes the update come out clean.
The immidiate problem is solved on my end, not to my liking for the
time being as I use the source download from time to time.
>>> The mirror status page for ftp.nl.debian.org seems to report it
>>> being good ( ftp.acc.umu.se is noted as disabled though).
>>>
>>> W: Failed to fetch
>>> xz:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.nl.debian.org_debian_dists_testing_main_binary-amd64_Packages:
>>
>>>
> Hash Sum mismatch Note that there are some apt bugs as such too,
> see from
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624122#81
Interesting. Removing the list files did not really help, didn't hurt
either it seems.
I do however have pdiff fetching disabled in my apt.conf. Reverting it
to true seems to be in vain.
If my machines are the only ones affected this can ofc be disregarded =)
- --
brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTTN3lAAoJEJbdSEaj0jV7ud0H/1td7h5hYKnGoFPXfCv02Rsu
5aE5gLsqxdK6wsH8zAdgLXgg98bOqC5CpNZYLcqBeP8GkjVJZTIBL49OJ5VPJFTh
szBlJUpdnFwSivoV61GAEz/fA/pqM3xq73XhnHi5/xiw295fphN/AIyA6OItwEz9
K8BUJl7s/KxstMbcv6vcipyBrbjKlhU2AUethVgi1k7QrKEJTrkpB0zy3zW7BXZm
ROLaJ/H80FDdxDIdkTwE/WDgpPyqmcxZ4eIjtthLo67MTeYAD+GVxqyd8g1Pzre/
6h08tC1lEfg1q2Y62Zcb0ItYtyhs6eNhTye/wqUo27hJirHkUi4PQbNeNddJBjA=
=+vJk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: