[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#661975: RFS: gearman-interface [NMU] -- fixes 2 RC bugs



Hallo Sanrdo,
thanks for your response. I'll add the patches to the BTS.

Note: Clynt (the current maintainer) asked me in a response to one the
BTS entries fixes (#6318020) to include his changes from his VCS as
well:

Am Freitag, den 02.03.2012, 23:55 -0800 schrieb Clint Byrum:
> Thanks, I have not been able to spend much time on gearman-interface
> lately. Thanks for the heads up. Note that the Vcs-Bzr in the package
> is more or less correct, and you may want to consider tacking my
pending
> changes on top of this as one of them is an RC bug fix. 

I think this would be best for the quality of package, but isn't
strictly NMU anymore (could also include other changes -- did not check
yet). 
Would this OK be with you?

coldtobi

Am Samstag, den 03.03.2012, 17:14 +0100 schrieb Sandro Tosi:
> Hello,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 06:45, coldtobi <tobi@coldtobi.de> wrote:
> > gearman-interface (0.13.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
> >
> >  * Non-maintainer upload.
> >  * Fix "FTBFS: SWIG version >= 1.3.31 is required. You have 2.0.4."
> >    applying patch from ubuntu (Closes: #631820)
> >  * Apply fix for newer libgearman-dev (changes includes)
> >  * Fix "python-gearman.libgearman and python-gearman: error when trying
> >    to install together" Cherry-picking relevant sections of the attached
> >    patch in the bugrport (Closes: #620469)
> >
> >  -- Tobias Frost <tobi@coldtobi.de>  Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:03:30 +0100
> 
> I'd be happy to sponsor it but:
> 
> - remove all unneeded changes to debian/control (probably generated by
> the unhelpful sort-and-something tool)
> - you need to post the debdiff on the relevant bugs on BTS.
> 
> If you can send another package, i'll give it definetely a look (don't
> bump debian revision!).
> 
> Regards,
> -- 
> Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
> My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
> Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
> 
> 
> 




Reply to: