[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: conque



Hello,

 I have re uploaded a new version of this package.

 To access further information about this package, please visit the
 following URL:

 http://mentors.debian.net/package/conque

 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/conque/conque_2.3-1.dsc


I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

>>>
>>> Regarding debian/copyright:
> That's much better. I'd put a space between "Upstream-Name:" and "Conque",
> but that's only a minor aesthetical nit-pick.
DONE
>
>>>> W: vim-conqueterm:
>>>> virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends depends:
>>>> vim-python

> That's all right now. (Personally, I'd use vim-nox as the first alternative,
> as this is the one with the least elaborate dependencies, but I don't
> insist.)
vim-nox it is ..

>> Now the package description reads
>> <snip>
>> Or you could just use his text verbatim, which will make me
DONE
>
> 1) If someone installed conque when he had python 2.6 installed, and then
> upgraded python to 2.7, the modules needs to be recompiled (see last
> paragraph of Python Policy 2.6)
>
> 2) Your postrm possibly removes files of other packages.
>
> 2) You are not the first person to deal with the problem with the problem of
> bytecompilation, and some kind people even wrote helpers, so that you don't
> need to write postinst/postrm scripts by hand or worry about 1) or 2).

use the appropriate helper --with dh_python2 and also rewrote the
debian/rules file

>
> Other stuff:
>
> Please add (non-empty :P) disabledby field to the YAML file, as recommended
> by the Vim packaging policy.
DONE and disabling and enabling using vim-addons is also verified.

There are two lintian messages:
P: vim-conqueterm: no-upstream-changelog
-- Upstream does not have changelog
I: vim-conqueterm: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
-- I have used the description suggested by debian-english as is.


Reply to: