Re: shlibs
* martin f krafft [Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:11:34 +0200]:
> Do you want your dependency to be satisfyable by either xmms (which
> shlibs suggests), or beep-media-player (which shlibs does not
> suggest). If so, you are either going to have to provide your own
> shlibs.local file and put in an appropriate entry, or manually
> define the dependencies in debian/control. AFAIK, shlibs cannot
> handle alternatives.
what I was trying to point out on irc was: if ${shlibs:Depends}
expands to xmms, that's because a binary in the package links against
/usr/lib/libxmms.so.1. if you workaround that, you'll end up with a
broken (*) binary in the system.
(*) there may be (I'd say) valid circumstances in which that result
is acceptable. I myself do that in one of my packages. I was just
trying to make you aware of the consequences.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
The Wright Brothers weren't the first to fly. They were just the first
not to crash
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: shlibs
- From: Sven Mueller <sm+debian@leogic.com>
- References:
- shlibs
- From: David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net>
- Re: shlibs
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>