also sprach Tilman Koschnick <lists@subnetz.org> [2004.10.19.1637 +0200]: > I have some experience with shared libs, and some experience with > deb packaging, just not with official packages yet, so they never > had to withstand the scrutiny of debian developers... I would suggest finding a good sponsor willing to walk you through all the traps. Ping me again in two weeks if you have not found someone until then. Note that I am not really claiming to be a good sponsor when it comes to libs, but I maintain a couple myself and have made my fair share of errors. > dh_python generated the dependency on python. Although in this > case, I think it's unneccesary. I'd like to keep the python module > in the main package, at least until someone actually uses it for > something else and wants it split out. But I'd prefer not to have > gpsd depending on python, since the program itself doesn't need > it. I think this is best answered by doko or someone else more experienced with Python. I would assume you can leave off the dependency under the circumstances you describe. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature