[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Correct way to do binary-only NMU?



* "Christian T. Steigies" 

| On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| 
| > Yes, you are right.  But there are not problems with hundreds of
| > packages, are there?
|
| No, only 80 known packages currently
| http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/quinn/needs-failed
| but an unknown number of not-yet-known problems.

ouch!

| > I guess the Developers reference should be clarified (the 7.4.3 that
| > is, as it seems to be clarified in 8.2).
|
| Well, yes, maybe. I just take it that porters are different and prefer to
| spend time on porting over writing the laws.

Developers reference is just that - a reference.  It's not the law.
Policy is 'law'.

-- 

Tollef Fog Heen
Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.



Reply to: