[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Splitting imaging into two separate tasks



> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 06:50:52AM +0200, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > > where we should move all pure microscopy sized applications and
> > > copy the borderline cases.
> > 
> > This is rather arbitrary.
> > 
> > Medicine can be divided into Care and Research. Both need microscopic
> > as well as macroscopic imaging.
> 
> So this is a vote against spliting the imaging task because you think
> all these applications tend to be installed on the very same machine and
> in medicine the specialisation to certain fields is not that harsh?

This is what I think, not a vote. Basically what I'm saying is that
the split between micro- and macroscopic imaging is not necessarily useful.

A primary split between Practice and Research would be much more useful
(to me).

(Average) Doctors (as opposed to Medical Scientist who happen to be
doctors) may find Debian Med somewhere. The moment they cannot easily
filter  Practice from Research releated software they will go away.

Karsten


Reply to: