Re: Looking for a DD to upload mummy
Andreas,
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> I have checked out SVN and obtained the source via get-orig-source
> target. I added a small change (GZIP="--best --no-name") which has the
> purpose to get identical tarballs for any use (which is not ensured
> without the --no-name option).
Thanks ! I'll update my other packages, I keep spreading this mistake
over and over.
> I'm definitely missing a comment about the issue
> "# Use a light weigth version of cableswig"
> Please document the rationale in README.source why you can not use the
> Debian packaged cableswig.
Updated. Basically the build system would try to retrieve the latest
version of cableswig from the CVS.
Since cableswig is going to be deprecated in ITKv4 (and because
cableswig does not provide library), one has to download cableswig
locally to build mummy (statically linked).
> In general I would try to contact upstream whether they might be able to
> provide something like a downloadable tarball or at least a web page
> which mentiones the latest upstream version (and the according tag in
> git) to enable us to write a proper watch file. I'm quite keen on
> having a watch file for any of our packages to enable us to catch up
> with upstream.
ActiViz.NET is quite old. It has been around for years, but it has
been open-sourced only a few weeks ago. I really hope they'll polish
the website as they did already for
VTK,ITK,paraview,cmake,cdash,batchmake,gccxml,igstk,vtkedge...
> The last issue is the copyright file. Please use the DEP5 format as
> described in
>
> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/#index7h1
Sorry about that. I was simply using the generated file from dh_make.
This should be all fixed now.
Thanks again,
--
Mathieu
Reply to: