04/09/2012 05:11 PM, Daniel Baumann: > On 04/09/2012 04:58 PM, anonym wrote: >>> if we'd do that, we could, fs label wise, get away with 'overlay' >>> and 'snapshot', both being below 11 characters, so no fallbacks >>> for legacy fs'es/os'es would be needed. > >> Perhaps 'live' is good enough as a new label? I leave the naming to >> you. > > live is a bit too generic, in particular since probably the rootfs > might have such a label in some setups. OTOH, a live-persistence.conf file must be present on the fs root in addition to the 'live' label for it to make any difference. > if we, as you impled, can unify the code so that snapshot and overlay > is being deduced by live-boot from looking at the config file, then, > we could use one label only. It ought to be pretty simple since the home-sn code practically does what we want already. I'll have a look at it some day soon, but I won't promise anything :). > i suggest that to be 'persistence' (which coincidentally is exactely > 11 characters :). Sounds fine. Cheers!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature