Re: custom license (package: bwctl)
Le Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 09:20:19AM -0500, Clark C. Evans a écrit :
>
> | without contemporaneously requiring end users to enter into
> | a separate written license agreement for such enhancements
>
> Ok. So, this language iss the one under debate I guess.
> Simply putting on a license text isn't sufficient, you need
> to *require* end users to *enter* into a *written* agreement.
Hi,
this is exactly the key point. In my understading, “to enter into a written
license agreement” can be done by receiveing a license text, reading it and
accepting it. If one can read it, it is written. But I am not a native
speaker. If it is the meaning of the Internet2 license that both parties must
sign a document in order to “enter into a written license agreement”, then it
is not a free license.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: