Re: Difference between license in files and in COPYING file

To: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Difference between license in files and in COPYING file
From: Joachim Wiedorn <ad_debian@joonet.de>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:55:56 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100214135556.0de6b014@venus.home>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 873a16f3dv.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References: <[🔎] 20100212231857.31fcbe87@venus.home> <[🔎] 873a16f3dv.fsf@benfinney.id.au>

Hello,

Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> 
> No, it violates DFSG §3.
> 
If the package violates DFSG, so it should be moved to non-free archive.
Because the package d4x does not have an maintainer (it is orphaned
again) Who can do this? Should it do the QA group? Or can it be an NMU?
I maintain Debian packages only since three months, so I don't want do
it by myself.


Fondest regards,
 Joachim Wiedorn

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Difference between license in files and in COPYING file
  - From: Joachim Wiedorn <ad_debian@joonet.de>
- Re: Difference between license in files and in COPYING file
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>

Prev by Date: Re: ISDA CDS Standard Model Public Licence v0.1
Next by Date: Re: Difference between license in files and in COPYING file
Previous by thread: Re: Difference between license in files and in COPYING file
Next by thread: Re: Difference between license in files and in COPYING file
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread