On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:29:38 -0800 Sean Kellogg wrote: [...] > Oy... this doesn't seem like it's going anywhere good. They should > have just written a license that says "you must give back your > changes, even if you don't distribute" and just called it good... Like they did with GFDL's Invariant Sections, maybe? > because that's going to be the net effect of this license in any > context that people consider using it. These extra legal contortions > are just an attempt to mask a non-free clause as, well, free. I agree. Have I recently reminded the readers that IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP ? -- http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through? ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
Attachment:
pgp7huSNx1fsH.pgp
Description: PGP signature