* Bruce Perens (bruce@perens.com) wrote: > The problem isn't the cost. Even the most expensive tier is only > $5K/year. It's the license terms. As usual for agreements drawn up to > accomodate the commercial software vendors of the world and not us, they > don't take into account sublicensing of our product. > > I'd be happy to license their mark for Userlinux, a commercial product, > if I felt their terms were fair for Debian. Nothing doing until that's > the case. What's the scenario you're concerned about here? Someone taking Debian and distributing it as "MyLinux" and Debian not protecting that use somehow? Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature