On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:29:03PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On reflection, we've rejected this exact clause (in its MIT Scheme > incarnation) as non-free in the past, after some heavy analysis of the > wording. All I found was the thread starting at http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200105/msg00178.html To me it seems to die out with no clear consensus. Regards, Daniel.