On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 19:57, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > In contrast, this second clause may be considered DFSG-free, I believe. > It states that claiming that *this work* infringes your patents causes > your patent licenses for *this work* to be terminated. This is a clause > protecting the work's freeness, which *only* applies to people > attempting to make the work non-free. I think I might be able to go along with that one. Would have to consider it more, but it certainly doesn't smack of non-freeness. Quite similar to GPL 4...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part