On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 03:08:26PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> writes: > > Non-free is up in the air for purely administrative issues, > Soon, you might need it to distribute documentation for central > software components. In fact, some DDs I asked think that this > strengthening of non-free is a very favorable side effect of the GFDL > debate. Really? I think that the current presence of non-free strengthens the case for not compromising our position wrt the contents of main, but I don't think I've heard anyone stating that the converse is also desirable. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgptY_RBjj6zl.pgp
Description: PGP signature