Re: GFDL Freeness and Cover Texts
>>>>> "Henning" == Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> writes:
Henning> Scripsit "Michael D. Crawford" <crawford@goingware.com>
>> I don't have any invariant sections in any of them, but each of
>> them specifies a brief back cover text:
>> Is that a problem?
Henning> My impression of the consensus that is shaping up is that
Henning> we're likely to consider *any* cover text as a
Henning> problem. The one you use does not seem to be particularly
Henning> obnoxious in itself, but it would be confusing and
Henning> unmanageable to use that kind of judgements for including
Henning> some docs and rejecting others.
How is this any worse than an advertizing clause or a requirement to
make a statement in supporting documentation? We consider both of
those free.
Reply to: