Re: Legal questions about some GNU Emacs files
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 08:39:08PM +0000, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> What do I think? I think WHY-FREE is a very ironic name for something so
> non-free. It should be removed, of course. I'm sorry if RMS will be
> unhappy, but the DFSG does not make exceptions if people are unhappy.
> Documentation *is* software, and therefore its licenses must follow the
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is your idea... documentation is documentation and software is
software... then we can discuss about all the documentation licenses,
but they are different things.
--
Christian Surchi, csurchi@debian.org, christian@firenze.linux.it | ICQ
www.debian.org - www.softwarelibero.it - www.firenze.linux.it | 38374818
Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy syscalls
done, In kernel as it is in user!
Reply to: